Templating a Government 2.0 Blog

photo_102408_005What is a blog, and how does it fit into Web/Gov 2.0? Because with the most basic use of the technology, a blog isn’t much different at all from a traditional Web site, and those have been around for a long, long time (OK, if that offends, the fact you’re reading shows you’re young at heart 😛 ).

So what makes a blog 2.0?

I would argue that it has to be interactive. It has to allow comments, and the author of the blog has to respond to and interact with the commenters. It should often link to other sources, promote the work of others, and have a collaborative instead of pedantic or hubristic tone. The author should also comment on others’ blogs now and then.

After these essential elements, you have structural problems to address: how to handle commenting, how often to post, what other resources to include.

Commenting is easy. We’ve got a model from the President’s transition site, Change.gov. In short: “stay focused, be respectful, tell the truth, no spam.” Change.gov’s policy also reserves the right to remove comments that violate the policy. Success in this area means clarity, and the gentle and consistent hand to steer comments back on track or to delete those that clearly cross the line.

How often to post is also easy. Three times a week, maybe a little more. If you don’t have anything to say or you’re going on vacation, perhaps you have a colleague who’d love to do a guest post.

More difficult is additional features. A schedule of events is good. Links to neighborhood or topical blogs. E-mail and RSS subscription options.

What else does a Gov 2.0 blog need?

(Also check out this great resource, a list of gov blogger Q&A’s by Municipalist)

16 thoughts on “Templating a Government 2.0 Blog

  1. Nice summary. I’d say it also needs a clear focus. Don’t try to be all things to all people.

    For my gov’t colleagues who are concerned about out-of-control comments: we’ve gotten about 5400 comments on EPA’s blog since we launched last April and maybe 10 were really vulgar, so were deleted. The bigger problem is deciding whether to allow commenters to promote products they like. We’ve decided to remove such references while leaving the rest of the comments intact.

    One other thing I’d add: you MUST accept criticism. MUST. Your credibility will be zero if you only post praise.

  2. What is a 2.0 blog?

    Dating myself beyond Tim O’Reilly’s coinage of Web 2.0, blogs have allowed commenting and hyperlinking. So, what’s different today, Adriel?

    I’d offer today’s blogs should not be restricted to words, but include embeddable images, videos, and other data structures. That’s what 2.0 is really about.

  3. Pingback: Posts about Blogging as of January 26, 2009 | Quality Wordpress Themes

  4. Sorry for my poor English, but my mother tongue is catalan and I’m just improving my English skills, but …

    I think that a GovBlog 2.0 has to be part of a bigger strategy and has to be only one of the tools to interact with your audience.

    Blogging municipality is about contact with people of your town, nothing more and nothing less than that. Could include a wide rang of references of the “social media” were municipality is involved and, first of all, the Blogger has to be in mind that a Blog is only a tool.

    Gov’t 2.0 = Web 2.0 + Attitude 2.0

    The core business was PARTICIPATION.

  5. Along with frequent posting, a clear focus, allowing comments (no heavy-handed moderation), responding to comments, and multimedia content:

    Tag posts – to provide some context to visitors and to allow navigation to other articles of interest.

    Use trackbacks – to allow visitors to find related posts on other sites.

    Be part of the community – engage in conversations, both within the blog (by responding to comments and linking to external content) and submitting comments to other blogs that have a similar focus. I believe that this is a major web 2.0 need, since a major facet of web 2.0 is collaboration.

  6. I think more than having the odd guest poster, more than one person’s involvement is important. I wouldn’t suggest more than 3-5 people (one per day in a week) or else the message will get watered down and readers/commenters won’t be building a relationship. But I also think it’s good to show a united effort in building that relationship, not just “one guy blogging.”

  7. I’m glad one of your provocative questions crossed paths with some of my free time!

    So, let’s focus on the “blog” itself. Remembering “blog” is just short for web log, and “log” means something like “official recording of events,” I think the first priority for Gov 2.0 is to focus on job #1 – recording events. Nothing fancy. Text is fine. I can read… but I want it all.

    Recording events unto themselves is just a start. Those events need to be captured in a consistent manner, and documented in a universal way – like international signage. Every knows what a green light or wheelchair symbol means. We need similar simplicity. The tens of millions of people in America who don’t use computers will need equal access to any computer-based government.

    There needs to be a common site (gov.gov?) that all elected officials must link to. Its 2009. We’ve all seen movies like Enemy of the State, Die Hard 4 or Eagle Eye. We know what technology is capable of, so its especially maddening when some public servant automaton-type sits there behind their Formica counter and tells us they can’t figure out how to set up a blog, or that its “against policy,” like a scene from more reminiscent of “Brazil.”

    Elected officials should have to post their daily “to do” lists and calendars while they receive paychecks from taxpayers.

    “Working for the government” is commonly seen as a “cushy job with good benefits.” I would like to see what my money is paying for. GPS tracking on government vehicles? Sure. Chris Matthews wasn’t joking when he said every check written on that bailout money should be scanned and posted on the web. There is nothing wrong with transparency when spending taxpayer money.

    And schools. Ugh. I have three school aged kids. The oldest has been in public school for ten years. Since day one, I have asked for teachers to get online. Even the simplest, most efficient ideas like a teacher simply blogging the days coursework and homework – go ignored. More disturbing is the apathetic attitude of teachers. They act as if they will get in trouble for blogging, or that its “extra” work. I’m not sure what they were considering putting on a blog that would make them liable for anything, and they can just as easily type out the days assignment on a blog instead of putting chalk to the chalkboard.

    Hmm… I guess that means “buy in” is a big concern. These kinds of things will have to be implemented and encouraged from the top. Otherwise, Gov 2.0 will just be another oversized, ill-planned, slow-moving version of the existing offline mess. Worse, the internet runs on electricity. It can be turned off in an instant. What happens if most of the important functions of government move to the web, then the web goes down?

    I have no great hope that, simply by virtue of being on the internet, government workers are going to magically start caring about the people they serve. If we have five clerks sitting on their asses ignoring real-life patrons at the DMV, we’re still going to have five clerks ignoring blog submissions. So, while interactivity would be great, I don’t see it happening much.

    We have to change the mindset of most government employees – the technology will evolve naturally on its own.

  8. See http://www.tsa.gov/blog. Their Evolution of Security blog is transparent, invites participation and is interactive. (3 elements the President emphasized today for in his memo for the yet to be named CTO).

    TSA blog team receives hundreds of comments and interacts with their readers. And, very importantly, have actually made changes based on customer feedback. (full disclosure, TSA is one of the agencies of my Department, but I would single them out anyway because I don’t think that anyone is doing blogging better, right now.)

    I agree that it’s critical to have a clear purpose and focus on a gov blog. Focus would include clear identification of your audience. Remember, there are many different ways that blogs can be used—to provide customer service, to explain policy, to provide insight into an agency, just to name three.

  9. The Around Dublin Blog reports on the many exciting developments throughout Dublin, CA. In the second half of 2008, the discussions on our blog became more lively than we had ever anticipated. We have received feedback from readers who are concerned about the occasional inaccurate comments made anonymously in the heat of the moment. While we share these concerns, we believe our savvy readers can discriminate insightful statements from ill-informed assertions and steer discussions back on topic on their own. We at the Around Dublin Blog are fiercely committed to protecting everyone’s freedom of political speech, even when the speech is critical of our work. What we have found is that personal attacks made by anonymous posters may get a lot of attention early on; however, they do not remain in most readers’ consciousness for long. Insightful remarks, posted anonymously or not, are the ones with staying power. Basically, we feel that it is up to the community to decide what is appropriate and what is not. We are blessed with a readership that gets what we are doing.

  10. Pingback: Eights Top Tips For Gov 2.0 Practitioners « Adriel Hampton

  11. Adriel,

    Great fast read, and wonderful comments that add value. I’m sharing with coworkers as we look at adding blog elements for citizen engagement.

    To the one comment with a negative view of government employees, I’d just say it’s not exclusive to the public sector. (Yes, I’m a public employee and have been for 11 years; before that, I had my own small company and worked in the private sector.)

    We’ve all had plenty of negative encounters with customer “service” people who aren’t, unanswered complaint letters, faulty products, and so forth.

    These are issues of organizational priorities, and recruitment, training and retention of the right people in the right jobs with the right tools.

    The shift to new tech tools will simply take time; the entire Baby Boomer generation started out with black & white TV and dial phones, after all.

    @BarbChamberlain

  12. @BarbChamberlain, I’m sure most would agree that there are apathetic customer service reps in both the private and public sector.

    The difference is, with private sector services, we can take our business somewhere else. If the government monopolizes a service, then sucks at performing it, we’re simply screwed with no alternative.

    Let’s not kid ourselves. The government will never prioritize customer service over its own growth.

  13. Good post and appended comments. It’s worth mentioning that at least in the Westminster system, anonymity is an enshrined value. Gov2.0 interrogates that value, but it can’t be swept aside lightly. Public servants must do their utmost to speak “truth to power”, meaning that in delivering neutral recommendations they mustn’t bend to whatever political breeze is the day’s flavor. Westminster’s structure protects public servants from public lynchings.

    More importantly, though, is the shield anonymity throws up against public bashing by politicians. Politics is war (hopefully without the violence!) and scapegoating of civil servants is always a clear and present threat.

    Unfortunately (or fortunately), many municipal administrations are already naked before the public, an engendered thing. Anonymity is a fiction in local gov. Next month, for instance, I will be making a recommendation NOT to fund a very popular capital campaign for Palliative Hospice. (The issue does not occupy our legislated policy domain). But the decision is ultimately political, not mine in the least. But who will be tarred and feathered, do you think? Radio, newspaper, citizens will be cross-examining me, not for a decision I won’t make, but for the professional advice I submit merely for Council’s consideration.

    I would have started blogging years ago had I NOT been in the public admin game. That said, I’m planning to do it now anyway because I believe we find ourselves in the midst of a radical Kuhnian paradigm shift. All I have is my integrity, so I figure if I can preserve that, I’ll survive. But the political criticism I will endure will be entirely misplaced, Councils, ethically, politically ought to be fully accountable for Council decisions. The deflections glancing off tough decisions WILL bounce on the faces of staff. A blog could exacerbate the sting.

    Our political systems are centuries behind our technologies, not weeks, months or years. The marriage will never be a comfortable one, no matter how much comfort our dreams of a benign public engagement may provide.

    Thanks for provoking thought once again. Appreciate it.

    Bob

  14. John Lilly,

    There are obviously some monopolies in government services in a given location. I recall learning in a graduate public finance class years ago that people do vote with their feet for various levels of taxation and services thus funded.

    While that takes some effort on their part, it does suggest that a government that isn’t meeting expectations will lose customers over time. If you think about people choosing to locate in the better of two school districts given a choice when they move to a new city, this makes sense.

    It also suggests that it’s a false dichotomy to say that government “chooses” (which is reification of something that is not a real living thing capable of choice, BTW) between growth and customer service. A popular place to live attracts more customers, needs to deliver service to more people, & grows through simple demographic drivers, if nothing else.

    I absolutely agree with several of your points in your first comment about the need for things such as good online access to school information. I happen to have that in my district (Spokane Public Schools).

    I’m also from a family of generations of teachers and I know just how much time “after work” teachers put in. It IS a new element to their workload to be updating something every single day. If we want to add new duties, we need to restructure the expectations and edit something out.

    As far as it being against policy, I’ll be speaking to a group of city & county IT directors in a couple of weeks. One of my questions will be to ask how many of them have firewalls and policies that don’t permit public employees to utilize tools such as blogs and social networks.

    I’ve heard that from a public information officer in a nearby city, and I expect the percentage to be fairly high. The belief that this sort of activity would be a waste of taxpayer money–public employees “wasting time playing online”–is fairly prevalent still. Your expectation of a lot of online availability is fantastic support for changes in just such policies.

    Good dialogue.

    @BarbChamberlain

  15. ?Android Software Enhancement
    Chapter four. Beneath the Covers: Startup Code and Resources inside the MJAndroid Software
    Chapter 3 introduced the major software we use in such a book to illustrate elementary Android concepts. That chapter explained which data files make up the source code, but it surely didn’t actually cover any source code during the software. We’ll begin the process of trying at source code on this chapter. And to permit you to definitely get started developing an software rather quickly, we’ll begin with the primary task every standalone software has to perform: initialization.
    The events covered in such a chapter occur concerning your selecting “Run As Android Application” from the Eclipse menu and seeing the map that MJAndroid displays at startup. This chapter shows how Android makes it painless to produce relatively complex apps. In just 80 lines of code and some associated XML resource information, MJAndroid manages to:
    Display an interactive map
    Track the existing location on the Android phone and update the map
    Set up a local databases of related information and load consumer preferences into it
    Supply a dynamically changing menu
    Display consumer interface aspects this sort of as labels, buttons, and spinners
    Run a new Activity to display a supporting screen
    The Java code in an Android software interacts tightly with XML resource data files, so we’ll bounce again and forth in between them in such a chapter. As we point out repeatedly, XML data files are easier to tweak during progress and retain over the life of an software. The structure of Android encourages you to definitely specify the take a look and behavior from the software inside of the resource information.
    Initialization Parameters in AndroidManifest.xml
    As Chapter 3 explained, we told Android to launch Microjobs.java as being the number one Activity for MJAndroid. We defined that relating to the Software tab in the AndroidManifest.xml editor. The to begin with part of your XML code that successes from that choice is proven listed here:
    This section on the chapter focuses over the XML in this particular file. The MicroJobs Activity is identified during the manifest for the beginning from the file. This part belonging to the file is normally created in Eclipse whenever you number one build the Mission that you just use to jot down your software .
    Like all smart XML information, line 1 has the standard declaration from the XML version as well as character encoding utilized. Before we get into the Activities that make up the MJAndroid software, we define one or two parameters and declare needed permissions with the whole software:
    This is just the package name we gave when we created the software in Eclipse. It is also the default package for all the modules on the software.
    This is surely an integer that should always increment with just about every new version for the software. Every software should include a version code, and it should always be a monotonically increasing integer from version to version. This allows other programs (these types of as Android Market, installers, and launchers) easily figure out which is the latest version of an software. The filename of your .apk file should include this same version quantity, so it is obvious which version it includes.
    This version identifier is regarded as a string, and it is intended to be a little more like the version figures you usually see for programs. The naming convention is up to you, but generally the idea is to utilize a scheme like m.n.o (for as a large number of quantities as you desire to use), to identify successive stages of change to the software. The idea is usually that this is the version identifier that would be displayed to some person (either by your software or another software).
    There are four of these in MJAndroid, and they declare that the software intends make use of attributes of Android that require explicit permission from the consumer from the cellular gadget functioning the software. The permission is requested once the software is installed, and from then on Android remembers that the consumer mentioned it was OK (or not) to run this software and entry the secure qualities. There are a lot permissions by now defined in Android, all described inside Android documentation (search for android.Manifest.permission ). You may also define your unique permissions and use them to restrict other applications’ accessibility to functions within your software, unless the person grants one other software that permission. The permissions requested below are:
    ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION. which is required to obtain location content from the GPS sensor.
    ACCESS_LOCATION_EXTRA_COMMANDS. The Android documentation doesn’t tell us which location commands are “extra,” so we’ll ask for all of these.
    CALL_PHONE. This facilitates MJAndroid to request that the Dialer site a cellular phone call on its behalf.
    ACCESS_MOCK_LOCATION. so we can get fake location advice when we’re working underneath the emulator.
    INTERNET. so we can retrieve map tiles over an Internet link.
    This is the filename for a PNG file that is made up of the icon you’d like to make use of on your software. In such a case we’re telling the Android SDK to appear for that icon file on the drawable subdirectory from the res (resources) directory below MJAndroid. Android will use this icon for your personal software inside Android Desktop.
    Turning our attention to the definition for your 1st (and main) Activity, MicroJobs, we initial define a handful of attributes to the Activity:
    The name on the Activity. The whole name belonging to the Activity comprises the package name (which in our software is “com.microjobsinc.mjandroid.MicroJobs”), but since this file is always employed on the package’s namespace, we really do not require to include the leading package names. The Android SDK strips the package name down to “.MicroJobs” when it creates this part of AndroidManifest.xml . and even the leading period is optional.
    The label that we hope to appear with the top from the Android screen in the event the Activity is to the screen. We saw this before in HelloWorld, where we changed the string in strings.xml to match our software.
    We then declare an intent filter that tells Android when this Activity should be run. We talked briefly about Intents in Chapter 1. and now we see them in use. As you’ll recall, when Android encounters an Intent to fulfill, it looks among the for sale Activities and Providers to get something that can program the Intent. We established two attributes:
    Right now Android is trying to launch this software, so it is wanting for an Activity that declares itself all set to resolve the MAIN action. Any software that is certainly going to be launched by the Launcher needs to have exactly one particular Activity or Provider that makes this assertion.
    The Intent resolver in Android employs this attribute to further qualify the Intent that it is seeking for. In this particular case, the qualification tends to be that we’d like for this Activity to be displayed on the Person Menu so the consumer can select it to start out this software. Specifying the LAUNCHER category accomplishes this. You can easily have a perfectly valid software without this attribute-you just won’t be able to launch it from the Android person interface. Normally, again, you’ll have exactly a single LAUNCHER for each software, and it will appear while in the same intent filter as being the opening Activity of your software.
    The most advantageous content for ones career. Discover unlimited learning on demand for round $1/day . https://payforessay_net/buy-essay

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s